Wrong to be Atheist

Dr John Sentamu, the Archbishop of York, has attacked public atheism.

In a report released earlier this week, Dr Williams (Archbishop of Canterbury) and Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor (Catholic leader) said:
“Many secularist commentators argue that the growing role of faith in society represents a dangerous development. However, they fail to recognise that public atheism is itself an intolerant faith position. If we pay attention to what is actually happening in the United Kingdom and beyond, we will see that religiously inspired public engagement need not be sectarian and can, in fact, be radically inclusive. This report argues that faith is not just important for human flourishing and the renewal of society but that society can only flourish if faith is given space to makes its contribution and its challenge."

'The Theos report attacks institutional atheism and argues against consigning faith to the private sphere. It claims that religion will play an increasingly significant role in the UK due to three trends: the return of civil society; the pursuit of happiness; the politics of identity.' (source)

Surely Drs Sentamu, Williams et al are being just as intolerant towards those who are secular, atheist, agnostic, etc?

I feel that it is appropriate to question the position of religion in public life. As a humanist, I strongly contest the idea that we need religion for society to be civil and happy. We need politicians, educators and law makers to be innovative, thoughtful and creative. We need enlightened citizens who care more about their responsibilities than their rights.

The journey wouldn't be easy but the destination would be worth it.